<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Glen Turpin: The Identity Question &#187; personality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.glenturpin.com/tag/personality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.glenturpin.com</link>
	<description>Who am I? Why am I here? What's this all about?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:21:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Put a face on the brand or not?</title>
		<link>http://www.glenturpin.com/2009/02/put-a-face-on-the-brand-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.glenturpin.com/2009/02/put-a-face-on-the-brand-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glenturpin.com/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back, I wanted to find out opinions about putting a human face on brands online or using the corporate brand. At the time, my blog-fu was weak, but I&#8217;ve now discovered PollDaddy.
Should companies identify themselves in social networks using brand names or employee names?
What do you think? Feel free to add a comment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.glenturpin.com/2008/12/to-speak-to-an-operator-press-0/">A while back</a>, I wanted to find out opinions about putting a human face on brands online or using the corporate brand. At the time, my blog-fu was weak, but I&#8217;ve now discovered <a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">PollDaddy</a>.</p>
<h3>Should companies identify themselves in social networks using brand names or employee names?</h3>
<p>What do you think? Feel free to add a comment and explain why.</p>
<p><script src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/1342019.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.glenturpin.com/2009/02/put-a-face-on-the-brand-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My blog&#8217;s personality type</title>
		<link>http://www.glenturpin.com/2008/12/my-blogs-personality-type/</link>
		<comments>http://www.glenturpin.com/2008/12/my-blogs-personality-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[meta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myers briggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glenturpin.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Typealyzer, this blog&#8217;s Myers-Briggs personality type is INTJ (Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging) &#8212; The Scientists.
The long-range thinking and individualistic type. They are especially good at looking at almost anything and figuring out a way of improving it &#8211; often with a highly creative and imaginative touch. They are intellectually curious and daring, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <em><a href="http://www.typealyzer.com">Typealyzer</a></em>, this blog&#8217;s Myers-Briggs personality type is INTJ (Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging) &#8212; The Scientists.</p>
<blockquote><p>The long-range thinking and individualistic type. They are especially good at looking at almost anything and figuring out a way of improving it &#8211; often with a highly creative and imaginative touch. They are intellectually curious and daring, but might be physically hesitant to try new things.</p>
<p>The Scientists enjoy theoretical work that allows them to use their strong minds and bold creativity. Since they tend to be so abstract and theoretical in their communication they often have a problem communicating their visions to other people and need to learn patience and use concrete examples. Since they are extremely good at concentrating they often have no trouble working alone.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve taken the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator assessment several times over the years, and have always been assessed as an INTJ. Not a bad guess, <em>Typealizer</em>.</p>
<p>The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator assessment is based on Jung&#8217;s theories and designed to measure psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions. Read <a href="http://www.typelogic.com/intj.html">more about INTJ</a>.</p>
<p>On the other hand, <em><a href="http://www.genderanalyzer.com/">GenderAnalyzer</a></em> thinks there&#8217;s a 75% chance this blog is written by a woman. Um&#8230; no.</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="http://www.annhandley.com">Ann Handley</a> (whom <a href="https://twitter.com/MarketingProfs/status/1032116461"><em>GenderAnalyzer</em> thinks is a man</a>) for the links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.glenturpin.com/2008/12/my-blogs-personality-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
